The king is corrupt, and a dictator, he has taken over in an illegal coupl,
He has no right to rule as he is from a serial killer's family, unlike most politicians
India is richer than Nepal, and Bhutan as it is a democrtaic republic,.
The king will offer alliances with any side, Pakistan's isalmicsts, China's communists, China's Capitalists, and India's Hindus, and Communists, in a mercenary satanic attitude, that forgets the rights of Hindus in Pakistan or Nepalese, in the BJP, the king is from a serial killer's family,
Overthrow him,
Decalre a republic in Nepal
I support democracy it is the best sytem,
The king was able to take powerr, as Nepal's government did not have power,
i.e the maosits, could nottake over in a coup, so why copuld a apparently powerless king,
also many hate the king as a corrupt, source of cash, living in a palace, which used to have a harem, he is a serf owner, and arrests decent child rights campiagnwers, and socialists, while freeing murderers, and comitting murders
Monarchy has killed more people in the twentieth century than Communism, when you incluide teh flu epdeimce of 199, and the world war one, etc, etc,
You claim politicains are corrupt, but in what way, they are not as corrupt as king or such, who live in apalaces, and own factories,
the war upped the last time the king tookover, and has again,
and under him, the economy slowed downm for the first time in deacdees
there was also a maoist revolt in teh 1970s, which saw dweaths, and riot kills,
teh king has never allowed democracy,
every mistake it makes he jumps on, Nepal has more child labourers and serfs per head than any land outside africa and Saudi
every mistake he makes he blames on politicians, a easy shorthand, as noone can sya yes i am to blame, as peopel are not [politicians, politicians, are not politicians, they are people, just liek teh evil king. except popliticains fight for teh peopel, while the king like Japna's emperor in ww2, fights for himself, and his image, then pretends, nowt was his fault,
and has killed many,
If 10 years of democracy were a failure, what about teh 3 years in teh middle of that, of dictatirship when most peopel died. and what about the fact Nepal was so poor under tegh monarcyhy, there were reviolts ineth 1970s, and oppression and famines, democracy would have worked if it had power, not teh kingm, re,member the maosits vould not lauch a coupo in a day, how could a apparently powreless kingm, who was not even liked. because nepal, was not allowed democarcy as it was not a democracy it must be to save it, from Chin aPkistan and the king,. whio is draculam d and ivan teh terrible
