“Since the King cited people’s movement 2006 as the reason behind the reinstatement, it was not necessary for him to cite any article of the constitution.”

-- Former minister Nilamber Acharya

hahaahaahah..
he had to save his face ni.

what about the following statement from another upper house parliamentarian - sounds like a free hand to do whatever they want?

According to Pokhrel, tenure of the incumbent parliament would depend on how soon the aforementioned agenda is completed.

Senior advocate and member of the Upper House of the parliament, Radheshyam Adhikari, too believes that since the reinstatement of the dissolved HoR was a political decision, there was no need to be limited within any article of the constitution. “It is a political decision taken as a result of the people’s movement,” he said.