Sorry, it?s a abrupt start. Actually I had written this for another thread but changed my mind so started a new thread which is crapy.


There isn't any genuine thought for Gyanendra to do all this for the people of nepal.He wanted to build a powerful monarch , which had lost its power and wealth in the course of democracy,so that when he dies his murderer son will have a strong monarch.

Gyanendra has made the same mistake which his Father made. If his father mahendra had not sacked the first elected government of nepal in 20016, our democracy would have come a long way and we could have seen stronger nepal not the monarch, by this time.

we are unfortunate like pakistanis who never had A SYSTEM OF GOVERNING. AND, we all know that the best way of governing is the democracy.

I have question for friends who POst their ideas supporting gyanendra's move, when you are supporting gyanendra's move you are supporting a autocratic sytem of governing, that means you believe in autocratic system of governing, then, why do you think you are in a foreign land where there is democratic way of governing?
YOu know the answer coz you have better life out here than what you had in nepal.Why do you think nepal did not have a better life? coz , we are told that we are born inferior than some people. thats not true. Every human are created equal and he/she is the only ruler of themself .

Talk about the countries where we nepalese like to migrate are those countries where there had been democracatic way of governing for long period of time. We just had two decades of democracy, altogether. Which was shadowed by the ranas in early 2007 and then dismantled by monarch in second democratic period.

Lets think a long way not just at this moment. Lets not live like a chamcha but like a leader where your ideas are respected. Each of us is a great soul and we deserve to take our own decision.

I think at this time when we all are heated up up for supporting Gyanendra or Maoist. These both are the autocratic system of governing. we should not be( but we have own freedom) divided between mao or gyanendra. the thing is, whether we want a democratic system of governing or a autocratic way of governing. Whether we support King Gyanendra or Maoist doctrine, we are supporting the same thing, the Autocratic way of governing.


The doctrine given by Mao five decades ago does not apply in this modern world and the concept of ruling a country under censorship does not fit either.

It's not give Gyanendra a chance but lets have faith in democratic way of governing . It does go through a lot of HIT AND TRIAL methods but eventually it will bring a new dawn.

Love you all.
triratna

ye samanti Raj pariwar lai france ko raj pariwar jastai itihaas ko pana ma matrai simit banaunuparcha.

they should be slaughtered one after another in khulamanch.

ganatantra ko bela bhako chaina HWY republic dude,

Its time for rajtantra.

Tuborg bro,

republic ko belo aahele hoina bhane k Gyane le desh ko sara sampati gutmutayera china ma asylum seek garna gaye pachi huncha ta.

These proponent of samanti should be slaughtered in khullamunch.

ha ha ha ha babajee
2046 ma aayo. 2005 ma khosiyo?
2005 ma ki 2061 ma??

Newuser jee you got be, right on.
my bet.

2007 sal mah prajantra aayo
2016 sal mah khosiyo
2046 sal mah prajatantra ayo
20061 mah feri khosiyo.

ruling a country is not like playing cat and a hat game. It is about institutionalizing a system of governing, and democracy is the best way of governing.

maoist, political parties, people and king should be like salt and vinegar in chips.
You cannot go to a peace talk with weapons on your arm.

Or the Maoist have to win over Ganendra's army like the Sandanista Communist rebels won over American supported Pres. Samoza of Nicaragua in 1979 after almost 2 decades of struggle.

Bhrasta netaa jee,
herdai janus this dictaror of 21st century will not be supported by anyone expect china.

Babajee

Well, the Sandanistas came to power with great glory however they were defeated in elections in 1990 . The socialist rule of Sandanistas came to an end after roughly 10 years after they came to power with great glory in Nicaragua.

netaa jee,
thank you for sharing your knowledge. I'm gonna do some more research my self.

have a great evening.

It's neither Democratic, nor Autocratic...

It's Dramatic... (Democratic + Autocratic)


bye.

kalankisthan dude that was funny lol desh ma nautanki nai bhaira cha
jhole

Hey guys, hardedai is back,
Exactly babajee, that's exactly what I am trying to say. No one wants cat and hat games. Neither you nor me, i think even 20 million nepalese don't want it. Now, as I have been saying from a very very long time, what is that, which can bring this game to halt, a complete stop. All those bloody netas ? Maoist ? if u think so u must be drunk. What is the option left ? King. Do you see any other option ? I don't see. Its easy to make a dream democratic government but do u see the possibility at the present, in reality. I don't see any possiblity. I asked all of you a question, its a multiple choice question for all the nepalese.

*Nepal ma kolle saasan gareko herna chahanu huncha ?
a) King
b) Maoist
c) The same old a$$ holes (netas)
d) all of the above (it was going on)
e) none of the above (no one knows what this is gonna be like)

What would be ur answer for this question ?

I appriciate all of your participance.
o;sf] pQ/ lb+bf oyfy{sf] w/ftndf pleP/ pQ/ lbg'xf]nf, g ls :jKg ;+;f/sf] /dfO{nf]df e'n]/ .


Jai Nepal

Jhole sir, i don't think "dramatic" is supposed to mean "nautanki" I suppose it is suppose to mean "irony". Might be I am wrong but i don't see any thing to laugh at the irony of our country and our people.

Harkedai , present situation of our country kasailai nautanki lagla bhane kasai lai chai irony. Ahile bikasit hudai gaya ka ghatana kram herda ta malai ta lagcha thula nautanki huadai cha rastriyata, rastra jogaune naam ma ani janata lai uniharu ka maulik hak adhikar diilaune bhandai.

jhole

WHich one of the following you want? Plz vote:

1> Nepal annexed in indian territory
2> Nepal annexed in chinese territory
3> Nepal being colonized in the american territory
4> Nepal , remained as a sovereign country , but a failed unstable state
5> the himalayan kingdom, with constitutional monarchy and multiparty democracy

which option is the best for nepalis to live in PEACE????
AJSABo1



Yesterday, I would have choosen no. 5
Today I've got the 6th option.
A succesful republican state, with no Gyanendra, no Girija, No Makune, No Prachande, No panche but all of us.
Newuser




- http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/feb/10swadas.htm
- Ktmdude


-

(1) Does not "get" democracy. Talks all Mahendra talk when talking about political parties and the democratic experiment.
(2) Inflexible on many counts, especially in opposing any possibility of a Constituent Assembly.
(3) Cunning, not magnanimous.
(4) Doubled royal budget after sacking Deuba first time around. That is brahmaloot, much larger what the Congressias did in the 1990s.
(5) Surrounded by lackeys and yes-men, a small clique, holdovers from the Panchayat
Paramendra



Help will arrive by ground tomorrow.......




________________________________________
nice
Posted on 02-08-05 1:33 AM Reply | Notify Admin

Help is coming......... soon





________________________________________
nice
Posted on 02-08-05 1:34 AM Reply | Notify Admin

Help is moving.........


________________________________________
nice
Posted on 02-08-05 1:40 AM Reply | Notify Admin

Milita in Trainning Far East........... Coming


Nice