Moaning about the maoists killing people, come on , the child labour, and criminal policies of roylaists killed 1000s a year, in famines, too others,
In this war more people, have been killed by teh royal army than by the maoists,
i feel it would be best if Nepal was a democracy
but i feel monarchy has prooven to be very evil, as teh saying goes a royalist cares about teh king but not a child labourer or a a peasant evicted from his land, but a maoits cares about the people, and not about teh royalists, maoists would be better than royal rule, but democarcy would be better than maoist rule, and only teh brutal nazis, in teh royal army and vermin of tehm feel otherwise, like teh blood drinking king,
The king is corrupt, and a dictator, he has taken over in an illegal coup,
He has no right to rule as he is from a serial killer's family, unlike most politicians, and probabaly is teh serial killer who killed members of his own family network,
India is richer than Nepal, and Bhutan as it is a democratic republic,.
The king will offer alliances with any side, Pakistan's islamists, China's communists, China's,
Capitalists, and India's Hindus, and Communists, in a mercenary satanic attitude, that
forgets the rights of Hindus in Pakistan or Nepalese, in the BJP,, all mutually incompatable, exept for a mercenary,
Overthrow him,
Declare a republic in Nepal
I support democracy it is the best system,
The king was able to take power, as Nepal's government did not have power,
i.e. the Maoists, could not take over in a coup, so why could a apparently powerless king,
also many hate the king as a corrupt, source of cash, living in a palace, which used to have a
harem, he is a serf owner, and arrests decent child rights campaigners, and socialists, while
freeing murderers, and committing murders
Monarchy has killed more people in the twentieth century than Communism, when you include the
flu epidemic of 199, and the world war one, etc, etc,
You claim politicians are corrupt, but in what way, they are not as corrupt as king or such,
who live in a palaces, and own factories,
the war upped the last time the king took over, and has again,
and under him, the economy slowed down for the first time in decades
there was also a Maoist revolt in the 1970s, which saw deaths, and riot kills,
the king has never allowed democracy,
every mistake it makes he jumps on, Nepal has more child labourers and serfs per head than any
is as they do not take all the credit even in Britain Churchill did not get al the credit for winning ww2, or fdr but in ussr Stalin claimed it all, and kings claim all credit, and blame advisors for all failings,
if you compared on eon one the king with any politician the king would be worst, as he killed so many, and saw so many deaths in his 3 year stint in power, and has lost so many allies, so its ?thje politicians. And a alien invader style hatred of human rights, activists, , never a particular one, only the stereotype, and that is a made up person
if monarchists hate human rights so much they should be treated like animals,
while the king like Japan?s
emperor in ww2, fights for himself, and his image, then pretends, nowt was his fault,
and has killed many,
If 10 years of democracy were a failure, what about the 3 years in the middle of that, of
dictatorship when most people died. and what about the fact Nepal was so poor under the
monarchy, there were revolts in the 1970s, and oppression and famines, democracy would have
worked if it had power, not the king, remember the Maoists could not launch a coup in a day,
how could a apparently powerless king, who was not even liked. because Nepal, was not allowed
democracy as it was not a democracy it must be to save it, from China, of which he is becoming
the finger puppet of, Pakistan and the king,. who is Dracula d and Ivan the terrible
remember in the 20th century more people died of royalist ww1, and it?s flu epidemic, and king Leopold, than under communism, and the worst communist regime, which I shall not mention was a fusion of that most evil ideal, of monarchists and communists, and was ousted by the sort of communists who the Maoists are, remember the communists saved Europe from Hitler, and also it is worse than democracy, but the most successful system is democracy, and both are better than murderous royalty,
which are the worst royalties on earth, (a) Saudi Arabia, which caused the civil war in Sudan by making it?s secular socialists impose sharia law ion the S, and by forcing in an islamist group into their coalition, guaranteeing that the government had to keep with it, and by buying land which disposseded peasants and forced them to revolt, and join the rebellion, and it cause the Algerian war, by funding the isalmist groups, that started the civil war, and caused the Yemeni civil war, and the Somali civil war, Afghanistan?s recent post-soviet wars, none of these wars helped anybody and they did not even help islam, as they paid saddam to invade iran, and also created bin laden, whether in the same way Ulster protestants created the iran, by hating catholics, or by the way that maybe they did actually create him, and they still arrest maids, who escape from their contracts early, and make them work, even unpaid, and they fund corrupt British Prime ministers children, like Mark Thatcher, and they still have the last vestige of slavery where they see in mecca Ethiopians, are bought as slaves, which does not happen in Ethiopia to pay for visits to mecca, and costs, and they buy livers from Egypt off poor mad people, who then have it given to richj Saudi drunks, who often own harems, this does not happen in any other muslim land, it is not Islam?s fault. It is monarchy?s,
which is the second, worst
b) Nepal, the poorest and lowest life expectancy in s-asia, only Bhutan was poorer before the king took over, in the years of king?s rule, 7000 people died, in the 7 years of democratic rule, 3000, and it was falling,. In the 1970s there were commie revolts which killed many, so the revolts did not start under the democracy, and increased under monarchy, it has highest slavery and bonded labour, and child labour on earth, and deports Tibetan,
? SWAZILAND ITS KING KILLS, PEOPLE, AND HAS SEEN HIMSELF SAY ALL VIRGINS must PaRADE NAKED IN FRONT OF HIM EVERY YEAR, HE CHOOSES THE MOST ATTRACTIVE AS ANOTEHYR OF HIS WIVES, even if tehy are allready about to marry someone else,
AND SPENDS THE ENTIRE BUDGET, raised from these wronged men, ON THEM, they then leave, to other lands, fleeing this jabba the hut, and he finds more wives, he has had 25, since coming to power, and he then tries to punish teh families of thsoe wives, and even the wives,
and he then blames politicians, who have no power what so ever,
even when he purchases, wait for it, buying him an airplane, worth millions which they will be barred from using, heee ehheheh , he blames them, ahahhaha, it s laughable, how awful monarchists are, which he will use, yes he blames politicians for this, anyway as of this, this absolutist dictator then has seen his land now have the highest hiv rate on earth, so of course the lowest life expectancy, in the unbiased socialist life expectancy tables,
All because it is a monarchy, having a royalty ruling is just like having ant dictators ruling, except other dictators are normally less gfreedy, and coerruopt and thiock, and stupid, and less enterenched in power,
(D) Dracula, he killed more people of his own country than any in the 20th Century, even that royal-communist regime, well maybe withy the expetion of areas the nazis, ruled, and parts of Belgian royal congo, very evil,
(e) Ghenghis khan, I am sure you know all about him, as you are ruled by a king, and he obviously tells of how evil and degenerate they are,
(f) Bhutan the king has evicted over 20% of his country since 1990, in evictions of nepalese who came in the late 19thc and teh war of 2003, when he invaded forces he had allowed to saty in bhutan but was force dto evict thenm uinder indian threats in taht year, which meant moere peopl have died per head in Bhutanese wars in 200-2004, tghan in nepalese democracy 1990-91 and more than in india per head too, and it is poorer thania,. and has a lower life expecancty and only banned slavery in 1993, after a revolt in 1989, and arrests dissidents and steals the best jobs for the elite, and royal evil family, who steal cash from, tax, but iof a lower class member gets charity , they are condemmed, in evil unfairness
(g) kaiser he killed 75million people by causeing world war one, and it's flu epidemic, meaning monarchy killed more than communism, and only a bit less than far right dictatorships, which include some semi-monarchies, and constituional rightsist monarchies, and empires, etc etc, in the 20th century,
that is that nepal must be a republic
well kings create evil, and pain and misery
all of them rule, as a few centuries ago, some horriblw arriors tookover the land, and became kingm, treating you r ancestors liek slaves, and saying only they matterm, and the otehrs do not,
they say care about the king but not trhe child labourerm or the human rights activist jailed,
none of these human righst activists killed their own families, or saw teh war up under them,
face it, Kyrgyz, Lebanese, and such should own Nepal, if Nepalis can?t have democracy, or republics, someone else will, and won?t be threatening monarchy or dictatorship, unlike Nepal, Nepalis are not monkeys they can handle democracy
Long live the republic, long live the socialist state.
Down with monarchy, up with republics, up with democracy
if sikkim can be a democracy why not nepal,
the reis nothing wrong with what you call like a clingon guy in star trek, hugh man rites, if you oppose them you should e be trated like an animalike yiou are going to eat human, for pie,
you sickos, l;ong live democracy, l.ong live the republic, of nepal
democrcay democracy democracy democracy democracy
democracy democracy democracy democracy democracy
