This what the english edition of new of nepal is reporting.


NC urges Indian Nepal blockade

New Delhi, 16 March:--
NC leader and former minister Mahanta Thakur, lading a nine-member Nepali delegation of politicians, met with Indian Home Minister Shibaraj Patil and pressed for an ?economic blockade? of Nepal for the restoration of democracy, verncular daily Nepal Samacharpatra reports.

NC President Girija Prasad Koirala?s daughter Sujata, NSP (D) leader Rajendra Mohoto, Hridesh Tripathi and others were included in the delegation.
newsofnepal/br

- http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/5922_1284581,0015002100000000.htm

Nepal strikes back

Keshav Pradhan

Kathmandu, March 17, 2005

Leave us alone, says royal aide>/i>

Nepal launched a broadside against India on Thursday for skipping the Saarc summit last month and talking about the kingdom's political system while remaining oblivious of Maoist activities on its soil. It also criticised major donor countries for imposing their "ideas" on the Nepalese people.

"India is aware of the presence of Maoists (Nepalese) on its territory," said Tulsi Giri, King Gyanendra's seniormost deputy in the government. "We need not talk to it about them. The Maoists have links with the LTTE, People's War and Naxalites. How can India be oblivious of this and talk about the political system here?"

To support his argument, Giri quoted Indian newspapers and a speech reportedly made by Congress leader Karan Singh in Parliament.

Dragging Bhutanese King Jigme Singhe Wangchuck into the controversy, he said, "He also asked for measures to stop the Maoists who have posed a threat to neighbouring countries from Indian soil." He named Bangkok as another place where Maoists are located. Casting aside diplomatic niceties, Giri mockingly described the Bhutanese king as "the greatest democrat".

"Indian leaders did not mind shaking hands with him and making him their chief guest on Republic Day, but they refused to go to the Saarc," he said. There is a general impression here that India got the summit cancelled to avoid a direct meeting with the Nepalese monarch.

Giri also took a dig at friendly nations which called for a "representative government" in Nepal. "It's natural to react to something that you don't like, but you cannot impose your idea on anyone," he said. "It is up to the Nepalese to decide what they want? the king has repeatedly pledged his commitment to multi-party democracy? he has taken this step (the February 1 takeover) only to re-energise this system."

Giri criticised multi-party leaders for allowing themselves to be "remote-controlled" by others. "Diplomats host dinners for them, but they don't call us," he said. When asked to name the countries that were backing the politicians, Giri replied, "It's up to you to guess."

View/Share this post only

Bharsta,

You gonna take a discussion around the bushes again. You know damn well that bringing republicanism means maoists coming in the power. I do not have to remind you over again over of possible genocides and possible foreign interventions.

NC coming for the armed struggle with their bunch of thuugs is another mob like maoists provided with weapons. This will lead the country to nowhere. You believe it will get the popular support in the like of Sujata Koirala. Definately country gonna end up like Afghanisthan.

He talk too hypothetically. There is no practical implications. You said you ready to take a bullet. Prove it. Do something for the country than talking about raisng war.
Peace out

history has shown that no country has been successful under a dictatorship!yeah i agree too that the political parties were not up to their mark!they in fact did commit a lotta mistakes too!but that does not mean u impose a ban on political parties,press,etc ......what i believe is that democracy is a developin thing,,look at india it took them arnd 60 yrs to figure that out!so it was just 14 yrs for nepal!!!!!!what im tryin to say is there is a process for everythin ,,,,,,,,,followin the rule that power comes from the barrel of the gun is not a solution

What the heck did this new constitution written on 1990 achieved? No matter, how democratic the constitution is, nothing works well, unless the politicians work selflessly.
Rather than invoking India to put a ban on Nepal, this politician could have learnt something from Gandhi and rather sat on a "bhok hadtal". That way, he could have shown his point of view without further hurting fellow Nepalese. What can we say about these pro-india netaas. They dress like them, eat like them and even prefer to speak Hindi even in formal interviews. The dramatic story by Sujata clearly indicates that she can act much better than her cousin Manisha.
Blame it on the politicians, Nepal would be a better place if there were only fistful of politicians who would think good for Nepal. Matter of fact is, good politicians are extinct species in Nepal.

Harkey dude

First of all, the Constitution of Nepal of 1990 is badly unrealistic and very poorely addresses the social and political realites of Nepal therefore how do you expect it to achive anything above average.

By the way bad and corrupt exist in every countries around the world and not only in Nepal. Even the most democratic western nations have corrupt politicians. The only difference is that in the most western democracies, politicians comes under heavy scrunity and are held accountable by public and by the laws of that country.

Newuser dude

"Constitutional monarch" as described in the Constitution of Nepal 1990 already means monarch and the commoner shall adhere to the same legal framework of laws written under the Consititution Nepal 1990. In theory monarch was already under the same legal framework as commoner do but see what happened. Monarch didnt feel compelled to live with the same legal framework because he had loyal support of his military. He knew when he had loyal support of the Army he can scare the hell out of civillian authority and everyone else in between and trample with any kind of provisions limiting his powers that existed in the Constitution. Monarchy system has proved over and over angain that any words written in any any legal document is not a diterrent for the monarch to comply with those words.

Only until either the monarch or his army is dismantled, the marriage between the Nepali monarch and the Nepali Army will not end. As long as one of the two is gone for good, even the general consesus between all the parties that exists in Nepal will not be able to put the monarch under the same legal framework IN PRACTICE.

Bringing Nepal Army under tight control of taxpayers (who pay for maintaining the Army) is more important than any need to keep the monarchy system alive. If the monarchy has to be sacrificed in order to bring Nepal Army under the tight control of taxpayer, the sacrifice is well worth it.

Look, even if you like it or not, Gyane will put his loyal army into use to attempt to scare the heck out of all other political forces in the country. He might not be able to scare the Maoist, he is certainly able to scare other political forces with his miltary muscle .

In the current political realites, the Maoist are the only existing political force who can muster an effective armed resistance against Gyane's force. Gyane doesnt have intention of implementing any socially progressive political agendas, neither in paper nor in pactice. The Maoist at least have some socially progressive political agendas in paper at least and the most important thing is that unlike feudal mentality of Gyane, the Maoist leadership can be brought down from their leadership status if the average fighters get pissed off with the leadership.

Compare and make choices of your own dude, or else end up, get stuck and be shut down (just like those pityful political parties) from being any effective force. If you cant take some pain and risk, I dont expect anyone to make any great differences in any front of life.

NO NO
NOT .
The constitution I am talking about is a totally different constitution Bhrastaji.
Who says 2047 constitution as a constitutional monarchist constitution? Sambhadhanik Rajtantra bhandaima hunchha. It gave the King unprecedented power and kept him above the legal framework. There are as many as a dozen of clauses putting the King above comonners. It was given the final touch by the monarchist. 'Sambhidan ko samrakchhak sri pach hoibaksanchha'. How can this word be kept in a constitutional monarchist constitution?Tesaile ta tyo constituion kai aadma Gyane le system khana sakyo.
The new constitution I am talking about accepts the existence of King. Thats it. No extra privillege otherwise. Full authorities on any subject for the parliament. No privillege to the King. The national army being renamed by constitution as Nepali Sena and run by the authority of the country's parliament. Thats the type of constitution I am talking about.
Aba yo constitution, Maobadi le matra eklai layuna sakchha? Kadapi sakdaina. All parties except the monarchist must unite to achieve this kind of constitution. Otherwise, Maobadi le aile samma jamma gareko shakti sab khera janchha. Unless all other forces who oppose autocracy in the country unite together Gyane cannot be forced to accept constituent assembly election.
Once that is acheived, Republic of Nepal is up in the horizon. Once the present King dies, no one will be there to back Paras to be the King of Nepal. Ani Ganatantra nabhaera k hunchha ta Nepal ma. Aba aile nai Ganatantra lyuchhu bhanera eklai ladna khojda Maobadi will be finished. So it's better for their own interest to allign with the parties with the common goal of achieving a truly constitutional monarchist constitution as the first phase of their ambition towards a republic state. Jaha samma Naulo Janabaad ko kura chha, Nepal ma tyo kahile auna sakdaina. Kinaki more then half of the popular voice is totally against a communist state. Tyo chai utopia matra ho Maobadi haruko.

ANother thing, RNA will not fight to death to save Gyanendra. I am against Baburam Bhattarai's logic that RNA should be defeated to achieve democratic republic state in Nepal. RNA comprise of the sons of commoners. If a mass of a hundred thousand rallies infront of the Palace, Army will stop firing against the protestors as soon as 20/25 people die. Then Gyane will have no alternative then to escape and fly abroad. Eti sajilo upaya huda hudai why the heck is the maoists killing so many Nepalese and pushing the country towards a long-term civil war?
My suggestions to Maoists and Political parties is gather a mass of a hundred thousand amongst which 500 are willing to die for the sake of a republic state. Put them in the frontline and storm into the Narayan Hiti Palace all at a time. Then in one go, Nepal will be a republic state. Tara 1 lakh janata le patyaune kaam garna saknu paryo ni political parties and maoists harule. If they do something I can believe I am ready to be in the frontline of that rally which storms in the Narayanhiti Palace.

I agree with newuser..... 100,000 nepalese indeed can change the face of Nepal.... but the so called leaders hardly have any brain to gather that many people in front of Naranhiti. Talking about 500 people who will give up their lives.... will baburame and prachande will be ready to be within that 500 group???????????

C'mon, Baburame... fuc*kkk off with writing those fu*king articles in nepalipost.com or whercver... shit... don't talk about history anymore... let history be in the thick thick books.. don't play tricks with people talking about silly history.. You guys say yourself progressive... talk how to take country towards forward direction.. not backward... we don't have time for this bullshits.....

I agree with Premdai. How the heck maoists could be trusted for freedom and democracy?? Just think about their ideology. They beleive in single party communism. Once they are in the power they will be worse than anything else. Maoists must be defeated no matter what. Somebody posted a poem, in some thread which shows they do not even have ethics. It says they can do anything to bring communism.

Evil is not a solution for evil. Maoism will be the worst of all kind. Current context rquires unity between poltical parties and leadership change. Fisrt of all these corrupt polticians should be rooted out by these parties itself. This will help gain the peoples trust. Then only going back to multiparty democracy could be imagined.

Lets talk about the past although its all regrets. Multiparty system was a first step for democracy. There were different flaws but it was a first step. These so called parties should have worked for strong framework and better governace. This would have made poltical parties popular and could have significantly caught down the power of royals brought down in the system. Instead in reality, it just placed all the people with politcal affiliation above the law without straong framework.

But there is a lesson to be learned. I do not know how much lesson is learned. I am toally against Bhrsta Neta calling for arm struggle. It will not bring solution. It will result severve casulties and will cause massive destuctions. The consequences will be felt to years to come. Just see Afgahainstan.

You can imagine why king took the power. It was well konown fact that he want to get back into power. But what happened. These leaders tried to be in power with the help of king. Just see Deuba. This resulted in maiots gainging grounds cause of low morale. Just see at hit made in Sankhu which is just freaking 10 miles from KTM. No help arrived is not excusable at all.

So, what are the options. Maoists are not the one cause communism never works(hypotheticall considering they are fighting for true cause). There will be embargo at least. What about possible foreign interventions?? What about genocide?? Thats what mao beleives wiping out anybody agaisnt there belief. This is only considering them to be honest. But the truth is they are not fighting for the people. These so called ring leaders are killing people just for thier selfishness. Actions spek for themselves.

Only thing I see which might be viable is ledership change in thsee poltival parties. Finish sthem all off by their pown parties to generate public trust.

The mass movement is not possible with this leadership as nobody trust them. WHo is willing to give life to bring these basta*ds in power??

Highfly

The reality is that as long as either the monarch and his loyal Army continue to exist, Monarch and his loyal Army will continue to serve each other's interest no matter how strongly all the other political forces unite and no matter how hard these other political forces oppose the autocratic ideas of Gyane.

The snake might cave into the pressure of all other political parties if they ever manage to get the grass-root support again (which they dont have it now and probably wont be getting it back any time soon) and hide itself deep into its hole but that doesnt mean the snake will stop trying to get out of its hole and raise its hood again looking for another opportunity to strike again at another point in future.

Then it's time for you to shut up and hide deep into a hole until the favorable season arrives to fight back with NC's armed struggle.

Premdai dude

It will be great if the leaders of NC ever come up with the idea of armed struggle for the very simple reason. The monrach doesnt understand the language nor will cave into the pressure of any peaceful street protests by any political force. The only language and the pressure he understands is the language of the barrel of gun.

I'll support any group(or groups) that will uproot the monarchy system or the Nepal Army. Demise of any one of these two will bring the remaining one under taxpayer's tight control.

No matter how strong and tough the constitution and laws are made in paper limiting the powers of monarch. What the heck will compell or deter him to comply with those provisions of any future constitution and laws written under that constitution. I dont think he will feel forced to comply to those provisions of constitution and laws as long as he has loyal support of his military.

Though very unlikely, even if the political parties like NC and UML ever come to power in some unforseeable future, can they ever be able to force the monarch to comply with the provisions of any future constitution and laws or will these political parties (when they are in power) be ever be able to compell Nepal Army to comply the orders of civiillian authority instead of Gyane ? I dont think so unless either the monarch or his loyal army is gone for good.

Or else the civillian authorty will be able do nothing more than be "Bird Watchers" when incidents like Parash runs over the next civillian with his speeding vehicle or beats some guy at a bar or aims his SMG(Sub-Machine Gun) to another traffic-Policeman. Nor will the civillian authority be able to be nothing more than "Safari Tourists" when army gets itself into another "Doramba incident" (Aug. 2003).

The most likely source of possible foreign intervention in Nepal is from India (if they ever dared to), but they should also keep in mind that there are 12 Gorkha Regiments as a part of Indian Army. Nepalese should think about giving birth to another Baburam or Prachanda within those 12 Gorkha Regiments of Indian Army and initiate a mutiny in Indian Army. By the way 1/10th of Indian Army is staffed by soldiers of Nepalese origin.

Another option is to start another massive and extensive "Maoist-like" insurgency in the all bordering states of India from east to west of Nepal. Molest Indian security forces with Maoist like hit-n-run tactics all along the frontier. Make the entire nation totally hostile and ungovernable for Indians so that they back off just like the Soviet Troops left Afganistan after bitter defeat in the 1980s

Just like bitter experience for Americans in Iraq despite their enormous fire power.

I absolutely support the Nepal blocket until and unless Democracy is restored with full human rights protections, civil rights and fundamental rights of people of Nepal.

Nothing can come before and against of human rights protection under the rule of law in a Democratic civil society; not even nationality or the sovereignty of the so called country with certain physical bounderies.

We Nepali have to learn and see the importance of human rights protections from the international communities observations and actions for innocent and poor Nepali people.

We must be ashamed not to ask questions and think firmly how can a nation be called a nation which resticts the fundamental rights of people? How could we respect a leader or head of the state who wish to cross our fundamental rights and freedom of speech? How can we trust our army whose very title is to protect the king (RNA) not people but turture, jail and kill with cold blood?

Nepal is going throught civil war with the king and RNA wants to stop it without any political outlet. How could that be viable without the support of India and international communites? This sort of agenda have hopeless future of all Nepali people.

How could be there the existence of Nepal without the fundamental rights of people under the rule of law - a democratic process? This can not be acceptable to the international communities and India.

If situation gets worst in six months - no political outlet to the Maoists conflicts, no restoration of Democracy, detoriation economics India will have to invade Nepal with army with the UN and international communities consensus.

Invation of such sort will be necessary to protect a FAILED NATION.

NEPAL IS A FAIED NATION WHICH HUMAN RIGHTS CONDITIONS ARE OF SUDAN.

एक नजर यता पनि मारम साथीहरु

माओवादी अध्यक्ष प्रचण्डलाई खुल्लापत्र
न्युयुजर

प्रिय प्रचण्डजी,
तपाइ नेपालमा पारम्परिक सैनिक शक्तिको केन्द्र दरबारलाई पराजित गरि जनवादी शासन स्थापना गर्ने अभिष्ट लिएर दशौं हजार युवाहरुलाई सशस्त्र युद्धका लागि परिचालित गरिरहेको पार्टी नेकपा माओवादीका शक्तिसाली अध्यक्ष तथा तपाईंहरुकै शब्दमा जनमुक्ति सेनाका कमाण्डर पनि हुनुहन्छ। तपाईंको नेतृत्वमा माओवादी विद्रोहीहरुले विगत एक दशकमा नेपालको मूख्यतया प्रहरी र केहि हदसम्म सैन्यबललाई पनि कतिपय युद्धमोर्चाहरुमा पराजित गरि केहि सैन्य सफलता हाशिल गरेकाले तपाईंहरुको पार्टी हाल नेपालको एउटा उल्लेख्य शक्तिका रुपमा राष्ट्रिय र अन्तराष्ट्रिय रुपमा परिचित भएको छ भन्ने तथ्यलाई नकार्न सकिदैन। विगतमा तपाईहरुले युद्धमैदानमा हाशिल गरेको सफलतालाई नै आधार वनाएर माओवादी विद्रोहीहरुले अनेकौ पटक देखाएका आतंकवादी चरित्रहरुका वावजूद उनिहरु देशको एउटा राजनीतिक शक्ति हुन् र उनिहरुलाई राजनीतिको मूलधारमा सुरक्षित रुपमा अवतरण गर्न दिइनुपर्छ भन्ने मान्यता मुलुकको विद्वत बर्ग र नागरिक समाजले राखेको हो। सदरमुकाम केन्द्रित सरकारी सुरक्षा संयन्त्र माथी बेलाबेलामा धावा बोली उनिहरुको अखडा केहि घण्टासम्म कब्जामा लिन सक्नु, धेरै हताहति निम्त्याउन सक्नु र हतियार लुट्न सक्नुलाई नै तपाईहरुले जनयुद्धको सफलताका रुपमा लिइरहनु भएको छ भन्नेकुरा तपाईहरु स्वयंबाट बेलाबेलामा आइरहेका वक्तव्य र प्रचारबाजीबाट बुझ्न सकिन्छ। यद्यपि तपाईहरुको जनमुक्ति सेनाले निरन्तर रुपमा सरकारी सेनामाथी ठूलो स्तरका हमलाहरु गर्न नसक्नु, सेनालाई पराजित गरेका स्थानहरुमा दीर्घकालिन उपस्थिति जनाउन नसक्नु र थोरै संख्यामा तर नियमित तवरले तपाईका लडाकूहरु सरकारी सेनाबाट मारिइरहनु पनि सिक्काको अर्को पाटोबाट देखिरहेको अर्को यथार्थता हो। दश वर्षको अवधिमा प्राप्त सफलताका कारण तपाईहरु सवै या तपाईंहरु मध्ये केहिलाई यहि जनयुद्धलाई निरन्तरता दिएर नेपालको केन्द्रिय शासन सत्ता हत्याउन सकिन्छ भन्ने आशा जागृत भएकोह हुनसक्छ। एक्लै सत्ता कब्जा गर्न सकेमा हामीले चाहेकै ढंगले शासन चलाउन सक्छौं भन्ने महत्वाकांक्षा पनि तपाईहरुमा नरहेकोहोला भन्न सकिन्न। आशा गर्नु र महत्वाकांक्षा राख्?नु अवश्य पनि नराम्रो होइन तर त्यो कतिसम्म प्राप्य होला भन्ने कुरा पनि विचारणिय हुन्छ। देशको वास्तविकता र अन्तराष्ट्रिय राजनीतिक परदृश्यलाई पनि विश्लेषण गर्दा र तपाईहरुको सैनिक सफलतालाई बिचार गर्दा के कुरामा प्रष्ट हुन सकिन्छ भने माओवादी एक्लैले नेपालमा पारम्परिक राजतन्त्रलाई पराजित गरि जनवादी सत्ता लागु गर्न कम्तिमा अबको आधा शताव्दि सम्ममा पनि सम्भव र ग्राह्य देखिदैन। बरु तपाईका अल्पमत पक्षका नेता वावुराम भट्टराईले भनेझै प्रजातान्त्रिक गणतन्त्र स्थापनाको लक्ष्य प्राप्त गर्न राजतन्त्रको आवश्यकता नदेख्?ने सवै शक्तिहरुसंग सहकार्य गर्नु तपाईंहरुका लागि हितकर ठहरिनेछ। नेपालमा अहिले राजतन्त्रको निरन्तरतालाई आवश्यक नठान्ने मानिसहरुको संख्या बढ्दै गइरेकोछ र सम्भवत यो जनमतनै देशको निर्णायक मत हो भन्ने अनुमान असान्दभिर्क नरहला। तर देशमा कम्युनिष्ट गणतन्त्रको स्थापनालाई मान्न तयार जनमत बन्ने सम्भावना बदलिदो विश्व परिस्थितिका कारण क्रमश क्षिण वन्दै गइरहेको यथार्थलाई तपाइजस्तो राजनीतिको कुशल खेलाडी र सफल संगठकले आत्मसात गर्नेपर्ने हो। यदि लक्ष्य प्राप्ति कठिन मात्र नभै असम्भव देखिन्छ भने आफ्नो सामर्थ्य त्यसमा खर्चनुको औचित्य रहन्न। त्यस स्थितिमा लक्ष्यलाई व्यवहारिकता प्रदान गर्न आफ्ना अवोधगम्य हठहरुलाई परित्याग गरि यथार्थपरक र वस्तुनिष्ठ उद्येश्य तय गर्नुपर्छ।त्यसकारण यदि तपाईंको पार्टी साच्चैनै देशलाई व्यवहारिक परिवर्तन दिन चाहन्छ भने जनवादी गणतन्त्रको स्वप्निल लक्ष्यलाई पछाडी छाडेर राजाको सम्वैधानिक सर्वोच्चतालाई अस्विकार गर्ने शक्ति तथा जनसमुदायसंग सहकार्य गरि प्रजातान्त्रिक गणतन्त्रको सम्भव लक्ष्य निर्दिष्ट गर्नु तपाईहरुको राजनीतिक सुझबुझ हुनेछ। यो लक्ष्य प्राप्त गर्न शुरुमा दरबारसंग मध्यमार्गी सम्झौता गरेपनि खासै घाटा नलाग्ने कुरा राजतन्त्रको बढ्दो अलोकप्रियतासंग गासेर हेर्न सकिने रणनीतिक चातुर्य हो। यसबाट एकातिर देशमा हिंशा र रक्तपातको जोखिम पनि घट्नेछ भने अर्कोतर्फ राजतन्त्रको सान्दर्भिकता नदेख्?ने तर शान्तिपुर्वक त्यस्तो संक्रमण भएको हेर्न चाहने उदार गणतन्त्रादीहरुको समर्थन हाशिल गर्न पनि सकिनेछ। अन्यथा एक्लै शाही नेपाली सेनालाई परास्त गरि राजतन्त्र उखलेर नेपालमा कम्युनिष्ट गणतन्त्र स्थापना गर्न र अन्तराष्ट्यि जगतबाट एक्लिएर त्यसलाई निरन्तरता दिन सकिन्छ भन्ने हठ माअनोवादी नेतृत्वले लिइरह्यो भने तपाइहरुको राजनीतिक जीवन त्यसै खेर जानेछ। अनि देश पनि बाह्य शक्तिकेन्द्र र स्वदेशी सामन्तहरुको पंजामा अझ कडा रुपमा जकडिनेछ र तपाहरुले अहिलेसम्म जोडेको शक्ति पनि क्रमश कमजोर हुदै तहसनहस हुनपुग्नेछ। । तसर्थ तपाईंहरु वास्तवमै देशलाई ठोस राजनीतिक परिवर्तन? दिन चाहनुहुन्छ भने जनवादी गणतन्त्रको रुमानी कल्पनालाई छाडेर समस्त गणतन्त्रवादी सोच राख्?ने जनसमुदायहरुसंग सहकार्य गर्ने औपचारिक घोषणा गर्नुहोस। देशमा हत्या हिंशा बढाउने भन्दा पनि आफ्ना लडाकु र कार्यकर्ताहरुलाई प्रजातान्त्रिक गणतन्त्रको सान्दर्भिकताको व्यापक प्रचार प्रसार गर्न लगाउने र नेतृत्व तहले तानाशाही राजतन्त्रको विरोध गर्ने सबै राजनीतिक शक्तिहरुलाई त्यस उपलब्धिका लागि संयुक्त आन्दोलनमा उत्रिन आव्हान गर्ने पहिलो कदम छिटो भन्दा छिटो चाल्नु मनासिव हुनेछ। तपाईहरुको सवभन्दा पहिलो काम आम जनसमुदायलाई आफूहरु आतंकवादी र उग्र कम्यूनिष्ट दुवै हाइनौ र हामी नेपालमा सामन्ति राजतन्त्रलाई तह लगाएर जनतालाई सत्ताको सर्बोच्च मालिक वनाउनका निम्ति लड्दैछौं भन्ने विश्वास जगाउनु हुनुपर्नेछ। हैन भने समयको प्रवाहले तपाईंहरुको अहिले सम्म आर्जित शक्तिलाई बगाएर निष्प्राण तुल्याई नदिकिनारको बगरमा हुत्यादिनेछ। समयको यथार्थपरक मागलाई बेवास्ता गर्ने भूल क्षणिक युद्ध उन्मादलाई आधार बनाएर कायम नराख्?न माओवादी अध्यक्ष प्रचण्डलाई एक शान्ति, न्याय र स्वतन्त्रता प्रेमी तर अराजनीतिक नेपाली नागरिकका हैसियतले मैले आव्हान गर्नुपरेको छ।

To be contd.
(In my own thread Thinking Impartially and Sensibly)

How cheap mentality. For their cheap political intrests they could come to this level.For these leaders people of Nepal is least valued and power is more important which could be easily understood from this recent activities of asking Indian authorities for economic blocade which will make living of 25 million Nepali people difficult.From such act people will suffer for food, medicine and other basic humanitarian needs. Any humanbeings could not go down to that level. Nihit swatha ko lagi afno lai gali garne ani paraya lai bau vanne haru ko k kura garne.